Why Obama’s Afghan Troop Surge Fell Short

At West Point in December 2009, President Obama announced a surge of 30,000 additional U.S. troops to Afghanistan—aiming to reverse Taliban gains and train local security forces. Andy Zelleke and Robert Dujarric argue that while the surge demonstrated American resolve, it lacked a coherent political endgame and did not address underlying drivers of the insurgency—such as weak governance, corruption, and cross-border sanctuaries in Pakistan.

They warn that without parallel diplomatic outreach to Pakistan, robust civilian stabilization programs, and clear benchmarks for troop reductions, the military buildup risked becoming a temporary “flash” rather than a sustained strategy. The authors conclude that future policy must synchronize security, governance, and development efforts to translate battlefield gains into lasting political progress.

Previous
Previous

Obama’s Nuclear Security Agenda

Next
Next

Reframing the U.S. Emissions Debate